From my present position as researcher at the Jan van Eyck, I came to gain an
interest in the Dutch welfare system. Hence, I am currently doing a detailed
exploration of the fascination for the environment, constructed around the
control and administration of social securities. This theme, associated with the
marginal, enables me to relate to a number of artistic strategies. The crux of
the matter is that most artistic projects do not wish to be associated with the
control regime they are criticizing. Yet, any form of reproduction,
representation and simulation – which is inherent in artistic practice –
contrasts with the invisible, uncontrollable nature of marginal places or groups
not willing to fit in any given framework. The same paradox of visibility occurs
in the rise of ‘Centres for Work and Income’ in the Netherlands. These so-called
‘Werkpleinen’ (‘job squares’) are the manifestations of a larger governmental
project, which integrates welfare and recruitment agencies and offers guidance
to create opportunities in the job market. The design is largely derived from
corporate business culture, as in the drive to gear transparency and publicity
towards client or public orientation. Nevertheless, the social security
recipient, the pivot of this policy, submits to intervening counselling,
implicating a withdrawal from his active role in society, which amounts to
social invisibility. When I take photos I activate the environment by
constructing it. However, the moment the shutter is released, the equipment
takes over. Via this temporal withdrawal, the critical status of the artist is
brought into question. I employ the consciously chosen, yet insuperable
vantage-point of the outsider, as an objective to set against, to challenge my
artistic vocabulary and production.
powrót |